International Standards Declaration

1. Ethics and malpractice statement 

 

If the Editors are made aware of an allegation of misconduct related to the published material, the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines will be followed.

Editors encourage Authors, Reviewers and Readers to contact the Editorial Office via email in the case of any suspicion of misconduct, such as (but not limited to): plagiarism, data falsification, figures/tables/citation manipulation or reuse without proper consent, unethical AI usage, authorship, and contribution problems. Allegations brought to the Editors’ or Publisher’s attention (pre- and post- publication) will result in specific-to-case measures that will be implemented according to the COPE guidelines. 

Editors together with the Publisher will undertake an investigation in order to verify the allegations. The outcomes of the procedure will be communicated to the sender, to the subject of the allegations and to appropriate institutions. In the case of false allegations, the outcome will also be communicated to all parties involved, including the institution and managers of the whistle-blower. 

Roles of Editor, Author and Reviewer

The Journal follows the COPE Code of Conduct in defining roles and duties, as well as Recommendations for Promoting Integrity in Scientific Journal Publications specified by the Council of Science Editors (CSE). 

Roles and responsibilities of the Editors: 

− The Editor-in-Chief (EiC) is appointed by the University of Warsaw. It is the EiC’s obligation to appoint Assistant/Section Editors and other staff needed for the Journal’s functioning. 

− Editors are accountable for all the content published in the Journal. 

− They are responsible for monitoring and ensuring fairness, timeliness, thoroughness, and civility of the peer-review and editorial processes. 

− They maintain the integrity of the academic record of the published material. − They are responsible for making unbiased decisions. 

− They follow the COPE guidelines when appointing new members of the Editorial Team for a 4 year term. The term may be reduced due to a member’s biased or unethical behaviour. 

- They define and execute the Journal’s policy, handle complaints and misconducts. - They disclose any conflicts of interest, should they emerge. 

Roles and responsibilities of the Authors: 

The Journal follows the CSE guideline that defines the Authors’ roles The Author-Editor relation is founded on confidentiality.

− The Corresponding Author is responsible for managing all queries and communication between the Journal and the Authors, including making corrections, providing feedback, and providing necessary permissions. 

− Authors provide a statement confirming the originality of the submitted study. − They disclose the originality of the content, their actual contribution to the study, conflict of interest, and funding. 

− They follow the Journal’s or the Publisher’s guidelines concerning the reuse of any copyrighted material and provide the material’s proper attribution. This includes the Author’s own work as well. 

− They should be aware of any data sharing responsibilities required by the funding agencies (please see the Journal’s policy on data sharing). 

− In the case of research involving humans, confidential materials and any other information protected by legal regulations, Authors must provide appropriate consents and permissions. 

Roles and Responsibilities of the Reviewers: 

The Journal follows the CSE guidelines concerning the Reviewers’ roles and responsibilities: Responsibilities toward the Authors: 

- Reviewers keep in confidence the details concerning the review process. 

- They provide written, unbiased, and constructive feedback in a timely manner. - They comment on the originality, accuracy, relevance, and linguistic competence of the article. 

Responsibilities toward the Editors: 

- Reviewers reply promptly to invitations. 

- They disclose any conflict of interest, ethical concerns, bias, plagiarism, or any other misconduct discovered. 

- They provide constructive criticism. 

- They indicate the ways to improve the manuscript. 

Responsibilities toward the Readers: 

- Reviewers make sure that the presented research can be validated by the methods and analyses described in the manuscript. 

- They make sure that the cited works are relevant and up to date. 

 

1.1.Authorship and contributionship 

Authors 

The Journal follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) guidelines and defines the Author as a person who has made a significant intellectual contribution to the study, drafted or reviewed it critically for important intellectual content, given the final approval of the article to be published and is accountable for all aspect of the work related to the accuracy and integrity of any part of the work. One has to meet all the four criteria to be defined as an Author. 

The Corresponding Author confirms that all the individuals listed as Authors have contributed significantly to the research presented in the submitted article. The Corresponding Author also confirms that all individuals listed as Authors have contributed to the entire manuscript. 

Contributors 

Individuals who do not meet all the four criteria of authorship cannot be listed as Authors. A proper acknowledgement of their input should be provided in the manuscript. As per the ICMJE guidelines. Such individuals may be responsible for: 

1. a) the acquisition of funding, 
2. b) general supervision of a research group or general administrative support, c) writing assistance, 

If the Editors are made aware of an allegation of misconduct related to the published 

1. d) technical editing, 
2. e) language editing, 
3. f) proofreading. 

In the case of individuals who have contributed unequally to the work, the Editors recommend that detailed information on their contribution be provided. 

The Journal strongly supports the Contributor Roles Taxonomy (CRediT) when describing each Contributor’s specific role. More information on CRediT can be found at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/leap.1210. 

Changes to Authorship 

If the Authors request that an Author be removed or added after the manuscript has been submitted or published, they provide an explanation of the requested change and a signed agreement from all the listed Authors, including the Author who is to be removed or added by sending a request at revistadelcesla@uw.edu.pl. 

Changes to Authorship are allowed only before the acceptance of the manuscript and only if approved by the Editor. 

The Editor may agree to introduce changes to the Authorship. This includes name changes, addition, removal, or rearrangement of the Authors after the article has been accepted for publication. Such requests will result in a suspension of the manuscript until the issue is resolved. In the case of an already published material a corrigendum is released. 

AI Authorship 

Upon submission of an article, the Journal requires the Authors to disclose whether they have used artificial intelligence AI-assisted technologies (such as Large Language Models [LLMs], chatbots, or image creators). The Authors who have used such technology specify, in the cover letter or within the submitted work, the details of such usage. 

The use of AI for writing assistance should be disclosed in the acknowledgment section. 

Unaccepted Authorship 

There are three types of authorship that are considered unacceptable: 

1. a) Ghost authors who contribute substantially but are not acknowledged. 
2. b) Guest authors who make no discernible contributions. 
3. c) Gift authors whose contribution is based solely on a tenuous affiliation with a study. 

The Journal follows the definitions of inappropriate authorship as specified by the Council of Science Editors. 

. 

1.2.Complaints and appeals 

Apart from misconduct allegations, Editors encourage Authors, Reviewers, Readers, and other individuals to contact the EiC, Editors, Editorial Board Members, the Publisher, or the Editorial Office in the case of complaints against the Journal, its staff, the Editorial Board, Publisher, or Reviewers. 

Individuals wishing to raise a concern or make a complaint may send an email to revistadelcesla@uw.edu.pl. The appropriate party will investigate whether correct procedures have been followed. The complainant will be notified about the outcome in writing. 

Complaints may concern editorial decisions, published articles, the review procedure, delays, unethical behaviour, and any other activity that is seen by the complainant as important. 

If the complainant wishes to pursue the complaint further, they may contact COPE directly. The procedure is available at: https://publicationethics.org/facilitation-and-integrity-subcommittee. 

1.3 Conflicts of interest / Competing interests 

All Authors must disclose any conflict of interest defined as a financial or personal relation with other individuals or organizations, activities or positions that can bias the submitted article. Such conflict includes but is not limited to the matters of familial kinship, employment, consulting services, honoraria, and funding. 

Conflict of interest also refers to any of the above-mentioned relations between Authors and the Journal’s Editors, Reviewers, Editorial Board, Editorial Office, as well as the Publisher. 

Authors are advised to disclose any potential conflict of interest before submitting the manuscript or during the editorial procedure. The Journal will also acknowledge the post-publication disclosure. 

Competing interest among the Journal staff, including Editors, Board, staff members and the Publisher, will be disclosed, if applicable, on the Journal’s website. 

Reviewers are advised to disclose any potential conflict of interest when they agree to review a manuscript or, if not yet known, after the publication. 

If a concern about a conflict of interest is made, the manuscript will be assigned to a different Editor or Reviewer. 

In the case of an acknowledged conflict of interest, the review procedures and the editorial decisions will be made independently of the disclosed information, based solely on the quality of the manuscript. More information can be found in the Description of the Review Process section. 

1.4 Data and reproducibility 

Research data typically refers to digital, machine-readable files and can be defined as the results of experiments and observations that validate the research. The Journal encourages Authors to post their data in standard formats that can be accessed and re-used by others. 

The Journal follows the Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reuse of digital assets (FAIR) principles . It supports data integrity and encourages Authors to share the data associated with their research and any other information that supports it. The Journal also encourages Authors to share their data on social media, repositories, and personal and institutional websites. 

The Journal supports the TRUST principles for digital repositories and encourages Authors to place the data in one of the repositories listed in OpenDOAR. Authors should also follow institutional and, if applicable, the funding body’s guidelines when choosing the platform to share their data. 

Authors are also encouraged to cite the data in their manuscript or indicate how to access the data by providing the DOI or access number. 

The Journal encourages Authors to share the VoR (Version of Record) and the AAM (Author Accepted Manuscript) together with the data associated with the research. 

The Journal encourages Authors to consult https://www.howcanishareit.com/ in order to determine how the published article can be shared. 

1.5 Ethical oversight 

Authors, Editors, Publishers, and Readers adhere to the publishing ethics described herein on the Journal page. 

The Journal encourages reports on any unethical practices such as, but not limited to, fabrication of data/research/figures/tables, plagiarism, authorship falsification, duplicate publication, peer review manipulation, concealment of conflict of interest, paper mill publication, and others. 

Upon submission, the Corresponding Author has to receive the approval form from all the Authors. The forms must be available upon request to the Journal’s Editors and include all the necessary consents to the use of third-party materials. The consent has to be obtained also for any research on human beings, managing confidential data, and ethical nosiness/marketing practices.

If any concerns arise, Editors will follow the COPE guidelines. 

1.6 Intellectual property 

Authors 

By submitting the manuscript, the Corresponding Author, also on behalf of all the Authors, agrees that: 

- the work is original, 

- it has not previously been published and is not currently under consideration for publication elsewhere, 

- all copyrighted material (e. g. block quotation or extracts) is properly acknowledged and the Author has obtained permission to use it. 

Reviewers, Editors, Editorial Staff, Publisher 

The Journal treats submissions as confidential during the whole editorial process until the manuscript is published. All individuals involved in the process, including Reviewers, proceed with adequate caution, most importantly to ensure that the manuscript or any of its parts are not disclosed, stolen or plagiarised. This also refers to instances of stealing research ideas. 

Any allegations of theft or plagiarism must be substantiated and will be adequately investigated. CC license 

The Journal is published in an Open Access model CC BY-SA 4.0 which allows for redistribution, reuse, and adaptation with attribution to the Authors. 

Redistribution is defined as copying or redistributing the article or its parts through any medium and in any format for any purpose. 

Adaptation is defined as remixing, transforming, and building upon the published material for any purpose. 

Users can freely access and use the published articles only when appropriate credit is given to the original publication and on the condition that they will not apply any legal terms or technological measures to restrict others from doing anything the license permits. 

By submitting the paper, the Author agrees to transfer the rights to publish the Contribution in any binding or medium to the Publisher. These media may include the Internet website of the Publisher and/or hosted on information services such as EBSCO Host and research bases, such as ResearchGate or Academia, or any scientific journal base the Publisher has already been included in or shall join in the future.

Authors grant the Journal a non-exclusive licence to publish their articles.

If Authors are not permitted to retain the copyrights to the manuscript, they should contact the Editorial Office before submission. 

Fees 

The Journal is published in an Open Access model. All published materials are freely and permanently available online immediately upon publication, without any charges (subscription, pay-per-view, etc.) or registration barriers. 

There is no fee for Authors to publish their manuscripts. The Journal does not charge an Article Processing Charge (APC), submission fees, the editing process fees or page charges. 

Readers are free to read and use the published materials as per the CC BY-SA 4.0 regulations. 

Plagiarism, duplicate publication, and fabrication 

Only original work can be submitted. All quotations need to be appropriately indicated and referenced. 

Any unacknowledged copying of large chunks of text, misattributing the original authorship (including ideas, arguments, results) will be treated as plagiarism. According to the Office of Research Integrity such practices include, but are not limited to theft or misappropriation of intellectual property and a substantial unattributed textual copying of another's work: https://ori.hhs.gov/ori-policy-plagiarism. 

When paraphrasing or summarising publications by others, Authors have to proceed with due care. 

Text recycling is not allowed and will be treated as self-plagiarism (as per COPE guidelines: “sections of the same text appearing in more than one of an author's own publications”). 

Duplicate/redundant publication occurs “when an author intentionally or unintentionally republishes his or her own work without informing the editor of the previous publication (…) and refers to publication of an article’s content, which has substantial overlaps with one΄s paper already published in print or electronically.” without proper references. (F. A. Habibzadeh and M. Winker, “Duplicate Publication and Plagiarism: Causes and Cures.” Notfall Rettungsmed 12, (2009), 415–418. DOI: 10.1007/s10049-009-1229-7). 

The Journal is part of the Similarity Check service and uses an anti-plagiarism tool (iThenticate) to verify the originality of the submitted manuscripts. In the event of a plagiarism detection, the Editors will immediately reject the manuscript and they may, depending on the case, take further steps according to the COPE guidelines. 

Already published articles will be retracted or marked as plagiarised. 

Prepublication 

Any fragment of work which has been already copyrighted to a third party, published, posted or reposted in the form that has been submitted to the Journal will be considered as pre-publication and consequently will not be published. 

The Journal can publish a manuscript that has been uploaded on a preprint server or has a DOI only if a significant amount of new data or original material is added. 

Preprint is not considered as prior publication only if the work fulfills the following definition: “a complete scientific manuscript (often one also being submitted to a peer-reviewed journal) that is uploaded by the authors to a public server without formal review” (Jeremy M. Berg et al., ”Preprints for the Life Sciences.” Science 352 (2016), 899-901. DOI:10.1126/science.aaf9133). 

The Journal allows republishing a conference paper only if a full disclosure and citation is provided. 

1.7 Post- publication 

Discussions 

The Journal supports post-publication debates regarding the published articles. Readers can submit their concerns, opinions, criticism, or letters of support. The Journal has the right to peer review the criticism, the response to criticism and to publish the discussion. 

The discussions can also be held on third party moderated platforms, such as PubPeer. As the Journal follows the COPE guidelines, the Editors require that criticism should: 

- be reasonable, 

- not contain libelous or defamatory content, 

- have evidence or data that support the claims. 

Readers can express their concern regarding the published material. The concerns should be sent via email at revistadelcesla@uw.edu.pl. 

Depending on the nature of the concern and the outcomes of an investigation, the Journal may publish: 

- an addendum (significant information disclosed after the publication that enhances the readers’ understanding of the article), 

- Editor’s note (to inform that an investigation has been started), 

- editorial expression of concern (to alert the readers about serious concerns), - correction, 

- retraction, 

- corrigendum. 

In the above instances, the Journal follows the relevant COPE guidelines  

Corrections 

If an Author notices a mistake after the article has already been published, they are requested to contact the Editorial Office at revistadelcesla@uw.edu.pl. Depending on the nature of the error, the Editorial Office will investigate the case and decide whether an erratum or corrigendum needs to be published. Only for substantial errors the procedure of corrections will be taken. Reports on mistakes in punctuation, mistakes not influencing the meaning of the paper or not affecting the scientific integrity of the paper, will not be processed. 

Retraction 

The Journal follows the COPE guidelines with regard to the retraction process. An article will be immediately retracted if: 

− It constitutes plagiarism, 

− The findings have previously been published elsewhere without proper attribution to previous sources or disclosure to the Editor, permission to republish, or justification (i.e. cases of redundant publication), 

− It contains material or data without authorisation for use, 

− Copyrights have been violated or there is some other serious legal issue (e.g., libel, privacy), − It contains unethical research, 

− It has been published solely on the basis of a compromised or manipulated peer review process, 

− The Author(s) failed to disclose a major competing interest that, in the view of the Editors, would have unduly affected interpretations of the work or recommendations by editors and peer reviewers. 

An appropriate retraction note will be published both as an individual statement, separate from the article’s contents, and within the article on the first page of the online version. 

Article removal 

The Journal will not remove any published material unless it gravely violates the law. In such a case, retraction is not sufficient, since the article may be subject to a court order or pose a hazard to human beings. 

In such cases the body of the article will be removed and only the metadata (the names of the Authors) retained, followed by a statement that explains the removal due to legal reasons. 

Changes to authorship 

For information concerning changes to the names of Authors, the order of listing, the affiliations etc. see the section Authorship and Contributorship – Changes to Authorship. 

2. Peer review process 

All manuscripts submitted to the Journal are subject to a double-blind peer review (the identities of the Authors and the Reviewers are not disclosed). Two external Reviewers will assess manuscripts initially accepted by the Editors after a technical screening and verification of the thematic scope. 

Reviewers submit their reviews in writing, together with the declaration of potential conflicts of interest and information whether they discovered the identity of the Authors. 

Reviewer form is available here. 

The review is anonymous and confidential. 

If the review is not satisfactory, Editors may invite additional reviewers or discuss the case internally. It is always the Editor-in-Chief who makes the final decision on any material to be published in the Journal. 

The standard peer review applies to all full-length articles and review articles. 

The conference materials will be published only if they meet the criteria of non-prepublication (see the paragraph Prepublication) and will be subject to the standard peer review procedure. 

Articles written by Editors, members of the Board or anyone else having a potential conflict of interest with the Journal (that needs to be disclosed) will be subject to the standard peer review procedure conducted by the Board members and Reviewers who do not have such correlation with the Authors. 

In the case of articles authored by the Editor-in-Chief, the review process is managed by one of the Section Editors who also makes the final decision. 

All the decisions are impartial, independent, and based only on the quality of the submitted material, also in the case of special issues or supplements. 

The Journal publishes a list of Reviewers on the web site, without disclosing details on the reviewed articles. 

Depending on the nature of the supplementary material, such material may also be subject to the peer review process. 

As the Journal operates on double-blind review principle, the Authors are requested to prepare their manuscript with masked authorship details (the names of Authors, their affiliations, funding, acknowledgement, etc.) that otherwise might disclose their identity. 

The guidelines for the submission process can be found here.

Any special issues and supplements are subject to the standard peer review procedure. Non-scientific material that is excluded from the external peer review procedure includes: 

- Introductions, 

- Editorials, 

- in memoriam statements, 

3. Archiving 

Editors are committed to preservation of scholarly research. In order to make the published content available and accessible the journal is archived in: 

- As per Polish legal regulations, the Journal is obliged to deposit copies of every published issue at the National Library of Poland. Upon publication, all the material is immediately sent to the Library and goes through archiving procedures. 

https://portal.issn.org/resource/ISSN/2081-1160

   

4. Revenue sources 

This is an Open Access Journal with no subscription charges. The Journal does not receive any revenues from publication of regular issues. 

The Journal is financed by the University of Warsaw. 

There is no subscription fee. 

5. Advertising 

The Journal does not accept publication of any advertising material. 

6. Publishing schedule 

The Journal is published twice a year, in June and in December. 

7. RODO / GDPR

Our website can gather personal data provided by the user, such as the name and contact information (e-mail address, affiliation, home address etc.). Likewise, if necessary, specific information can be required in order to process a request.

Our website uses gathered information to improve your browsing experience and to personalize content, especially in order to maintain a register of users and requests when applicable. It is possible that on the email address that you have provided you may receive messages sent through our website with new issues of the Revista, promotional information about activities, campaigns or initiatives organized by Revista del CESLA. International Latin American Studies Review, calls for papers, as well as other information that we deem relevant. You can unsubscribe from receiving those emails at any time. Revista del CESLA. International Latin American Studies Review is strongly committed to protecting your personal information. We use the most advanced systems and keep them up to date to make sure that there is no unauthorized access to this data.

At any time you may change or delete the personal information that you provided us with. Revista del CESLA. International Latin American Studies Review will not sell, lease or distribute your personal information without your consent.

Revista del CESLA. International Latin American Studies Review reserves the right to change the terms of this Privacy Policy at any time.